Inside the LSX Biotech Playbook: 11 Strategic Insights
- Simon Duole
- May 7
- 3 min read

3 min read 634 words

At the LSX Conference in London, we heard directly from biotech, VC, and pharma leaders. Here are the key strategic takeaways shaping todays healthcare landscape.
Funding
Series A is bigger, rarer, and more demanding
Average Series A rounds now range from $70M–$100M, reflecting the cost of innovative R&D. Fewer rounds mean higher stakes.
Deals are increasingly syndicated across multiple funds, requiring clear alignment and communication.
Investors demand de-risked assets: strong translational data, validated targets, and experienced operators (particularly in clinical and regulatory domains) at the helm.
Modality-specific capital still flows—if the story is focused
Despite broader market corrections, investor appetite remains strong in high-conviction areas:
Personalized oncology (e.g., BioNTech),
Next-gen small molecules (e.g., Sycona),
B and T cell therapies (e.g., Kurma-backed platforms).
AI may dominate the headlines, but it's not the only magnet—modality depth matters.
MoA clarity and a solid TPP are must-haves
Clear mechanism-of-action is essential to anchor valuation discussions and reduce diligence friction.
A compelling and realistic Target Product Profile shows strategic forethought, accelerates partnering, and signals commercial viability.
Late Stage / IPO
IPOs are later and harder—act accordingly
Treat IPOs as late-stage milestones, not exits. Most biotechs will require Series C or D rounds first.
Post-Phase II is not enough—commercial validation is expected before going public.
Financial discipline is essential:
Maintain ≥6 months of cash runway,
Limit convertible notes to ≤10% of market cap,
Keep alternative structures (royalty deals, etc.) ≤25% to preserve equity value.
At this stage, the CEO must be financially adept—not just a scientist or clinician.
Losing the CMO is a critical failure risk and should be avoided at all costs.
Operational strength is the true differentiator (Late Stage/IPO)
Boards and investors prioritize execution capability:
Cohesive capital plans,
Operational discipline,
Governance maturity.
Scientific merit opens the door; execution keeps it open.
Strategy
Strategic optionality is essential—not optional
Over 50% of blockbusters emerge from M&A and licensing, but the return on investment (ROI) from M&A activities has decreased in recent years.
Pharma increasingly prefers licensing over full buyouts, emphasizing flexibility and control.
Biotechs must develop a BD strategy and clear TPP early.
Deals structured to retain manufacturing or territory rights deliver higher value—$280M vs. $148M on average.
Pivot capacity must be structurally embedded
Capital efficiency remains a core expectation—lean into the "European model": milestone-tied burn, rigorous resource allocation.
Reset valuation expectations to current reality—2024–25 comps, not 2021 peaks.
Build pivot readiness into the roadmap: use decision trees and scenario planning to redirect assets without derailing momentum (e.g., Poolbeg’s shift to oncology).
China: competitive threat and opportunity
China is no longer just a “me-too” market—it’s a growing innovation hub, especially in cell therapies and ADCs.
Simultaneously, China is a source of low-cost licensing and CDMO partnerships, especially valuable to European biotechs seeking cost control.
Scout actively and early—top-tier Chinese assets are becoming globally competitive.
Resilience
Resilience through collaboration
Multi-territory co-development and co-commercialization reduce burn and distribute execution risk.
Regional licensing and royalty-sharing structures can preserve upside while offloading cost—especially effective in China-Europe linkups.
Incentives must reflect market constraints
Leadership KPIs should now tie to:
Capital deployment efficiency,
Pivot agility,
Partnership execution.
Move away from vanity metrics (headline valuations) toward durable value creation.
MedTech
Digital transformation as an embedded enabler
AI is reshaping healthcare delivery—not just in R&D, but also clinical design, regulatory pathways, and patient stratification.
Cross-disciplinary medtech innovation is emerging from the convergence of software, hardware, and connectivity, improving diagnostics, implants, and therapeutic devices.
Position AI and digital tools as platform capabilities that enhance precision and reduce time-to-market—not standalone investment narratives.
댓글